logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대법원 2014. 07. 10. 선고 2014다208859 판결
처분청의 부과처분은 그 하자가 객관적으로 명백하다고 할 수 없어 당연무효로 볼 수 없음 (상고기각)[국승]
Case Number of the immediately preceding lawsuit

Seoul High Court 2013Na202170 (No. 10, 2014)

Title

The disposition of disposition by the agency shall not be deemed null and void only because the defect in the disposition is objectively apparent (Dismissal of Appeal)

Summary

(1) If the substance of the disposition of gift tax is merely a misunderstanding of the facts required for the disposition of gift tax, or it can only be found that the facts should be accurately examined, it cannot be said that the defect is objectively apparent from an external appearance.

Related statutes

Article 58 of the Regulation of Tax Reduction and Exemption Act

Cases

Supreme Court Decision 2014Da208859 Decided Fraudulent Enrichment

Plaintiff-Appellant

United StatesA

Defendant-Appellee

Korea

Judgment of the lower court

Seoul High Court 2013Na202170 (No. 10, 2014)

Imposition of Judgment

oly 2014.10

Text

The appeal is dismissed.

The costs of appeal are assessed against the Plaintiff.

Reasons

The records of this case and the judgment below and the grounds of appeal were examined, but the appellant's grounds of appeal are examined.

The assertion on the grounds that it falls under Article 4 of the Act on Special Cases Concerning the Procedure for Appeal and therefore, the appeal is dismissed under Article 5 of the above Act. It is so decided as per Disposition by the assent of all participating

arrow