(영문) 의정부지방법원고양지원 2014.10.30 2013가단30663

beta

본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.

Text

Reasons

텍스트 조절

글꼴

크기(pt)

굵기

줄 간격

자간(%)

(영문) 의정부지방법원고양지원 2014.10.30 2013가단30663

손해배상(자)

Text

1. The Defendants’ respective amount of KRW 20,00,00, KRW 200,00 to Plaintiff B, C, and D respectively, and each amount of KRW 9,66,666.

Reasons

1. Basic facts

A. On June 7, 2012, Defendant E driven a F F bus (hereinafter “instant bus”) on June 16:13, 2012, and driven a two-lane road in front of the axis of the high-sea comprehensive playground located in the Gyeonggi-gu dialogue-dong, Seoyang-gu, Seoyang-si, in order to move, move, and turn to the port of the port, Defendant E entered the road at the entrance of the port of the direction of the instant bus and turn to the right-hand left-hand way (hereinafter “instant accident”), and G died due to long-term damage, etc. on the same day.

B. The plaintiff A is the spouse of the deceased G (hereinafter "the deceased"), and the plaintiff B, C, and D are the children of the deceased.

Meanwhile, the National Federation of Bus Transport Business Associations (hereinafter “Defendant Association”) is a mutual aid business operator for the liability for damages caused by an accident during the operation of the bus in this case.

C. Defendant E was indicted for violating the Act on Special Cases Concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents with respect to the instant accident, and the conviction (the District Court Decision 2012Da1363) became final and conclusive.

[Grounds for Recognition: Descriptions of Evidence A Nos. 1, 2, 3, and 4, Evidence A No. 10-1, 2-2, the result of the verification by this Court, the purport of the whole pleadings)

2. Existence of liability for damages

A. The plaintiffs asserted that they were responsible for compensating the plaintiffs for damages caused by the death of the deceased because they neglected the duty of Defendant E to present the front bank and caused the accident in this case. The defendants asserted to the purport that the deceased did not confirm the progress of the bus in this case and entered the right side of the bus in this case by force majeure without confirming the situation of the bus in this case, so it cannot be acknowledged that Defendant E violated the duty of care and therefore, the defendants are not liable for compensating the defendants.

(b) Determination Gap evidence 3, Eul evidence 1-1, 2, 4, and 7, and evidence 8-1 to 7, and Gap.

참조조문

-교통사고처리 특례법

유사 판례

-전주지방법원군산지원 2017.08.08 2016가단56491

-서울중앙지방법원 2017.04.28 2016가단5171350

-부산지방법원 2017.06.13 2016가단324157

-서울중앙지방법원 2017.11.13 2016가단5211500

-의정부지방법원 고양지원 2013.01.08 2012고단1363