logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 부산지방법원 2017.06.13 2016가단324157
손해배상(자)
Text

1. The Defendants jointly share KRW 5,288,048 with respect to the Plaintiff and the period from November 13, 2015 to June 13, 2017.

Reasons

1. Basic facts

A. On November 13, 2015, at around 20:40, the Plaintiff was boarding the B urban bus belonging to Daedo Transportation Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “Defendant bus”) and was going to the direction of the sub-field exhibition, the Plaintiff: (a) on the front of the Busan-gu Busan-gu Busan-dong department store, and (b) on the front of the department store, the Defendant bus rapided the Defendant bus to stop on the wind; (c) the Plaintiff got out of the floor of the bus with other passengers (hereinafter “the instant accident”).

B. In the instant accident, the Plaintiff suffered from the injury of the erode of the erode, the erode of the erosium, the erosium, the erosium, the erosium, and the ple

C. Defendant Mtsts Fire and Marine Insurance Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “Defendant Company”) is the insurer of the Defendant’s automobile, and the Defendant’s Federation of the Korea Bus Transport Business Association (hereinafter “Defendant Federation”) is the insurer of the Defendant bus.

The Defendant Company paid the Plaintiff KRW 1,567,330 in total from December 8, 2015 to July 25, 2016.

[Ground of recognition] Facts without dispute, Gap evidence 1, Gap evidence 14-1 to 10, Eul evidence 1, Eul evidence 1, Eul evidence 1 and the purport of the whole pleadings

2. According to the above fact of recognition of the liability for damages, the accident of this case is caused by the negligence of the defendant bus, which failed to perform the duty of care for safe driving and keeping the right and the right and the right and the right and the right and the right and the right and the right and the right and the right and the right and the right and the duty of care for safe driving, in preparation for the case of the vehicle that changed the vehicle's car's car's own car's car's car's own car's own car's own car's own car's own car's own

On the other hand, the defendants, as the plaintiff, have a duty of care to promote the safety of the bus by putting the bus knife in preparation for the sudden situation during the bus operation.

arrow