Title
Whether the capital gains tax paid is unjust enrichment where a sales contract is terminated;
Summary
If the defect in the taxation disposition is limited to the extent that the tax disposition can only be revoked, the payment of the tax due to it cannot be deemed as unjust enrichment unless the tax authority voluntarily revokes it or revokes it by the appeal procedure.
Cases
2019 Ghana56810 Unlawful gains
Plaintiff
Kim AA et al.
Defendant
Korea
Conclusion of Pleadings
2019.09.20
Imposition of Judgment
oly 11, 2019
Text
1. All of the plaintiffs' claims are dismissed.
2. The costs of lawsuit are assessed against the plaintiffs.
Purport of claim
The defendant shall pay to the plaintiff Kim Jong-ok 5,67,760 won and 10,415,060 won and 12% interest per annum from the day following the delivery date of a copy of the complaint of this case to the day of complete payment.
Reasons
In order to make an unjust enrichment, the tax payment or tax collection must be null and void as it has no legal basis at all in substance or in procedure, or as it is apparent and apparent the defect of the taxation disposition. If the defect of the taxation disposition is limited to the extent that the tax disposition can only be revoked, the taxation authority’s own revocation or revocation by the appeal procedure cannot be deemed as unjust enrichment (see, e.g., Supreme Court Decision 87Da54, Jul. 7, 1987). Although the taxation requirement of the capital gains tax was subsequently lost due to the termination of an agreement among the plaintiffs, barring any circumstances to deem that the taxation requirement of the capital gains tax under the plaintiffs’ report is null and void as a matter of course, the BB head of the tax office or the CCC head of the tax office voluntarily cancels the said taxation disposition, or there is no evidence to support that the said disposition was revoked by the appeal procedure, barring any legal basis to seek a return of the tax base based on the initial return of the capital gains tax return by denying the validity of the disposition (see, e.g., the plaintiff’s claim for return of the tax return to the defendant).