beta
Cases
2015Do15939 Violation of the Attorney-at-Law Act
Defendant
1. A;
2. B
3. C
Appellant
Defendants
Defense Counsel
Attorney D (Pream, for Defendant C)
Judgment of remand
Supreme Court Decision 2012Do9571 Decided February 12, 2015
Judgment of the lower court
Daejeon High Court Decision 2015Do130 decided September 18, 2015
Imposition of Judgment
2016, 5.12
Text
All appeals are dismissed.
Reasons
The grounds of appeal are examined.
In light of the relevant legal principles and evidence, the lower court’s judgment that found the Defendants guilty of the facts charged of this case, contrary to what is alleged in the grounds of appeal, did not err by misapprehending the legal principles on the name lending under Article 34(3) of the Attorney-at-Law Act, by misapprehending the legal principles on Article 109 of the Attorney-at-Law Act, or by failing to exhaust all necessary deliberations, thereby affecting the conclusion
Therefore, all appeals are dismissed. It is so decided as per Disposition by the assent of all participating Justices on the bench.
Justices Park Jae-young
Justices Park Poe-dae
Justices Park Young-young
Jeju High Court Decision 201Na1548
Justices Kim Jong-il