The judgment of the court below is reversed.

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than eight months.

However, for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

1. Summary of grounds for appeal;

A. Since the Defendant, without entirely recognizing the fact that a certain accident occurred by a vehicle which was in operation at the time of the instant accident, left the place of accident, the Defendant did not have the intention to commit a violation of the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes, and the judgment of the court below which found the Defendant guilty of the charges

B. Even if the Defendant’s intention on the grounds of unfair sentencing is recognized, the lower court’s imprisonment (eight months) is too unreasonable in light of all the circumstances.

2. Determination

A. The summary of the facts charged is that the Defendant is a person who is engaged in driving a CAP car, and around 04:20 on July 4, 2014, the Defendant, while driving the said car and driving the road in front of the TPpppppppppppppppppppppppppppppppppppppppppppppppppppppppppppppppppppppppppppppppppppppppppppppppppppppppppppppppppppppppppppppppppppppppppppppppppppppppppppppppppppppppppppp

나. 사실오인 주장에 대한 판단 피고인은 원심에서도 위 사실오인 주장과 같은 취지의 주장을 하였는바, 이에 대하여 원심은 "① 피고인은 역과 당시 차량의 흔들림을 느꼈으나 2, 3초 정차하여 룸미러와 백미러로만 사고유무를 확인하였다는 것인바, 주행 중 차량의 비정상적인 움직임을 인지하였다면 특별한 사정이 없는 한 즉시 정차 후 내려 확인을 하는 것이 일반의 상식인 점, ② 사고 직후 현장을 목격한 E는 사고 당시가 새벽이라 주변이 조용하여 덜컹 하는 소리와 박스 같은 것이...