A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

1. On December 8, 2017, from around 19:20 to 20:30, the Defendant: (a) was drinking and smoking in the second floor of the D Station C located in Ansan-gu, Ansan-si; and (b) was able to take a high level of desire; (c) the Defendant was prevented from drinking and smoking with the victim E and the social work personnel, but the police officer, who received 112 reports on two occasions, continued to drink and smoking until the police officer called for the victim for drinking and smoking; and (d) caused the disturbance, such as taking the victim’s desire to take a high level of desire, and taking the victim’s drinking and smoking.

Accordingly, the defendant, in collusion with B, interfered with the history management work of victims by force.

2. On December 8, 2017, at around 20:42, the Defendant: (a) stated that the police officer called out after having received a report on the act as indicated in paragraph (1) of the same Article, “a police officer’s bitch bitch bitch bitch bitch bitch bitch bitch bitch bitch bitch bitch bitch bitch bitch bitch, knhh, knit son, knit son.” The Defendant collected the bring of the Victim F(22) on the ground of the b

In this respect, the defendant carried dangerous objects and assaulted the victim.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Each statement of E, F and G;

1. Application of field photographs and Acts and subordinate statutes governing victim photographs;

1. Relevant provisions of the Criminal Act and Articles 314 (1), 30 (Interference with Business), 261, and 260 (1) of the Criminal Act and the choice of imprisonment for a crime;

1. Of concurrent crimes, the former part of Article 37, Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the Criminal Act;

1. Although the defendant with reason for sentencing under Article 62(1) of the Criminal Act committed a crime of the same kind, he/she again committed a crime even though he/she had been punished for the same crime.

The method of crime is not good.

However, the attitude of the defendant to recognize and reflect all crimes seems to be.

There is no more criminal penalty than fines for the same crime.

It seems that health conditions are not good.

The punishment as ordered shall be determined in consideration of such circumstances, the age, character and conduct, environment, etc. of the defendant.