logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대구지방법원 2017.01.25 2016가단18835
건물인도등
Text

1. The defendant shall be the plaintiff.

(a) deliver the buildings listed in the separate sheet;

(b)payment of KRW 1,040,000;

C. June 2016

Reasons

1. On June 15, 2014, the Plaintiff leased the building indicated in the attached list to the Defendant as KRW 1 million for lease deposit and KRW 2.6 million for monthly rent.

(hereinafter referred to as the “instant contract”). The Defendant did not pay the monthly rent after February 2015, and the Plaintiff terminated the instant contract on this ground.

With respect to unjust enrichment equivalent to the monthly rent until February 2, 2016 under the instant contract, the Plaintiff was sentenced to the Daegu District Court Decision 2015Gaso2975 Decided the payment of unjust enrichment.

[Ground of recognition] Facts without dispute, Gap evidence Nos. 1, 2, and 3, the purport of the whole pleadings

2. According to the above facts, the Defendant is obligated to deliver to the Plaintiff a building listed in the attached list with return following the termination of the instant contract, and to pay KRW 1,040,000 per month for four months from February 3, 2016 to June 2, 2016 and KRW 260,000 per month from June 3, 2016 to the completion date of delivery of the instant building.

If so, the plaintiff's claim is reasonable and acceptable.

arrow