logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2016.11.18 2016가단96676
건물명도 등
Text

1. The defendant shall be the plaintiff.

(a) deliver the buildings listed in the separate sheet;

B. (1) KRW 1,600,000 and as regards this,

Reasons

1. The description of the grounds for the claim shall be as specified in the attached Form;

2. Judgment without holding any pleadings (Article 208 (3) 1 of the Civil Procedure Act);

3. Part concerning partial dismissal

A. The base date for delay compensation for each of the following rents is not the date of the rent payment, but the following day. ① On May 20, 2016, KRW 1,600,000 (from May 20, 2016 to June 19, 2016) (2) On June 20, 2016, part 1,33,333 won (from June 20, 2016 to June 20, 2016 to the end date of the lease)

B. The obligation to return unjust enrichment equivalent to the rent, after the termination of the lease, is a debt with no fixed due date and the obligor is liable for delay from the time of receiving the claim for performance. As such, ① As regards the amount equivalent to the unjust enrichment from July 15, 2016 to August 19, 2016, KRW 1,866,67 [1,86,67 [1,600,000 - KRW 1,6333)] is recognized only as damages for delay from the day after the duplicate of the complaint in this case is served, and ② as regards the unjust enrichment for which payment is sought from the due fund from August 20, 2016, no damages for delay is justified.

arrow