beta
Text
The defendant's appeal is dismissed.
Reasons
1. Summary of grounds for appeal;
A. The Defendant, as stated in the facts charged, has no fact to see that the damaged person sacrifies at the place where he is gathered, and sacrifies it.
Even if the defendant made a statement like the facts charged, the defendant made the statement.
Even if the defendant's statement was not proven to be false, it was not proven.
B. The sentence of the lower court’s improper sentencing (an amount of KRW 500,000) is too unreasonable.
2. Determination
A. 1) In full view of the following circumstances acknowledged by the evidence duly admitted and investigated by the lower court as to the Defendant’s assertion of misunderstanding of facts, the Defendant’s statement that “the victim saw her intention to dumpate” as stated in the facts charged is recognized.
This part of the defendant's assertion is without merit.
① In the lower court’s court, the victim considered that the Defendant was able to take care of the victim before many people in the Pyeongtaek-dong new wall market on June 12, 2013 at P.D. at P.
the Commission.
was stated.
② Also, in the court of the court below's ruling, the defendant deemed that the victim would work in the above new wall market on June 12, 2013.
I stated that they referred to;
The statements are supported by the statements of the victim.
③ At the lower court and the first instance court, G considered that the Defendant was in the presence of the F danran, in the first instance court around June 2013, 2013, J in the presence of the F Garan, and M in the victim’s attempt to work at D’s place.
I stated that they referred to;
The statement has been made in a concrete and consistent manner, and there is credibility.
2) According to the evidence duly adopted and examined by the court below as to whether the statement was false or not, the victim made a statement that he did not steals money in the investigative agency and court of original instance. Since such statement is specific and consistent and consistent, the content of the Defendant’s statement that the victim stolen money seems to be false.