The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The summary of grounds for appeal;

A. A. Around November 201, 201, defamation made the victim’s speech that he/she stolen money on or around November 201, 201, but it is difficult to recognize the public performance, and the content of the statement was not proven to be false.

B. On June 2013, the Defendant of defamation does not have any fact-finding between F multilaterals, which is the place indicated in the facts charged, around June 2013.

2. Determination

A. According to the evidence duly examined and adopted by the lower court as to whether a public performance was recognized on November 201, 201, defamation 1) the Defendant stolen the money to the victim on November 201, 201.

Since it is recognized that there were customers, such as E, in the vicinity at the time of the speech, they can be recognized as public performance.

This part of the defendant's assertion is without merit.

2) In full view of the following circumstances acknowledged by the evidence duly examined and adopted by the lower court, the Defendant’s statement that the victim stolen money seems to be false.

This part of the defendant's assertion is without merit.

(1) A victim made a statement at an investigative agency that he/she does not steals money while working at the street store operated by the defendant, and such statement is specifically and consistent and credibility.

(2) E acknowledges that an investigative agency and the court of the court below have stolen money by a victim.

was stated.

However, E, however, stated in the investigative agency that it is impossible to submit a video image because he/she has taken a video picture with a Handphone that steals the victim's own money, but he/she could not submit the video because he/she has lost the Handphone. However, in the court of the court below, other persons who are not himself

The statements, such as statements, are not consistent.

Therefore, it is difficult to believe the E’s statement.

B. According to the evidence duly examined and adopted by the lower court and the first instance court around June 2013, G is from the F multilateral bank around June 2013 at the investigative agency and the first instance court.