(영문) 청주지방법원 충주지원 2020.04.22 2019고정330

beta

본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.

Text

Reasons

텍스트 조절

글꼴

크기(pt)

굵기

줄 간격

자간(%)

(영문) 청주지방법원 충주지원 2020.04.22 2019고정330

교통사고처리특례법위반(치상)

Text

The sentence against the accused shall be determined by a fine of one million won.

However, for one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Criminal facts

The defendant is a person who is engaged in the duty of driving vehicles B K7 on board.

On April 7, 2019, the Defendant, at around 13:00, proceeded with the front of the 235 public-private partnership road in front of the 235 public-private partnership road from the Gang-Eup bank.

At all times, there was a duty of care to safely drive a person who is engaged in driving along an intersection with a signal, etc. by reducing the speed and by properly examining the right and the right of the signal.

Nevertheless, the Defendant neglected this and caused the front part of the Dpoter vehicle's right side of the Dpoter vehicle of C(65 years old) driving, which attempted to be a microdeton on the same side due to the negligence in progress, even though the vehicle's moving signal is a red signal, to be shocked by the front part of the left side of the vehicle.

Ultimately, the Defendant suffered from approximately two weeks’ salt, tension, etc. in each of the foregoing occupational negligence to the driver C of the damaged vehicle, the passenger E (V, 68 years old) of the same vehicle.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. Police suspect interrogation protocol regarding C;

1. E statements;

1. The actual condition survey report;

1. A medical certificate (C);

1. An accident site photograph;

1. The Defendant and the defense counsel asserted that the Defendant did not violate the signal signals regarding the Defendant and the defense counsel’s assertion, since the Defendant passed the intersection at the time of yellow light, and the Defendant and the defense counsel got out of the intersection at the time of changing to red light and entered the intersection at the time of changing to red light, the Defendant and the defense counsel did not violate the signal.

According to the record, it is recognized that the signal of the signal apparatus prior to passing through the intersection was changed from the yellow light to the red light, and that the defendant passed through the intersection even though the signal of the signal apparatus was changed to the red light.

Therefore, we cannot accept this part of the defendant and defense counsel.

Whether the causal relationship between the defendant's negligence and the accident is recognized, and the defense counsel.

유사 판례

-수원지방법원 2021.02.09 2020고단7027

-대전지방법원 2014.12.04 2014노1818

-수원지방법원 안양지원 2014.01.24 2013고정1047

-전주지방법원 군산지원 2017.01.11 2016고단981

-광주지방법원 2011. 11. 25. 선고 2011노2629 판결