logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 2018.01.19 2017나72348
구상금
Text

1. The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Defendant.

Purport of claim and appeal

purport.

Reasons

1. Facts of recognition;

A. The relationship between the parties is that the defendant is the former male-friendly tool of C (mast, 35 years of age) and the defendant and B obtained through Internet hosting.

B. Defendant and B’s joint criminal conduct 1) aware that C keeps the funds acquired by adult Internet broadcast to the Agricultural Cooperative account, and, around 23:00 on July 18, 2015, the Defendant provided B with information about C’s residence, etc. and prepared tools necessary for committing the crime in the Defendant’s vehicle parked in front of the river basin No. 1, 53, the river basin No. 53, Gwangjin-gu, Seoul, the river basin No. 1, and then provided B with tools necessary for committing the crime. Since there are legal problems with the Internet broadcast that C is a police officer, B would like to act as a police officer, and would have to transfer or withdraw money from the said Agricultural Cooperative account to another account, and would have to prepare for the escape of C: The Defendant conspiredd with C by dividing the funds acquired by acquiring cash cards, etc. connected to the said Agricultural Cooperative Account from 10,000,000 to 20,0000,000 from the front of the 20,000.

3 around 05:30 on July 20, 2015, B presented the above police identification card to C residing home at the house underground parking lot of C, and “A. I. as a police station, it is necessary to confirm. I. as it is the police station)”, which prepared C in advance, returned to the EK5 car prepared in advance and returned to Gwangju City, Gyeonggi-si, Gangdong-gu, Seoulcheon-gu, and Guri-si. It is not a police officer, but the above police identification card is a police officer identification card held by C when it was discovered that the Defendant was a police officer.

arrow