logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 의정부지방법원 고양지원 2016.10.20 2016고단1903
사기등
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of eight million won.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, KRW 100,000.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

The Defendant, on April 2016, 2016, posted the title “F” at the lower house located in Seoyang-gu, Seoyang-gu, Seoyang-gu, Seoyang-gu, Gyeonggi-do, with NAVdididi, and falsely read that he/she would sell the right to 100,000 won cultural products to the victims G who reported it to the Defendant and contacted with the Defendant for sales to KRW 75,000.

However, there was no intention or ability to send cultural products to the victim on May 1, 2016, which was promised to receive the pre-contract.

Accordingly, on April 7, 2016, the Defendant, by deceiving the victim, received KRW 75,00 from the victim to the Agricultural Cooperative Account under the name of the Defendant, the transfer of KRW 75,000 for the reservation of cultural products rights, and received KRW 325,00 in total by the above three times as shown in the attached crime list 1 until April 30, 2016.

As a result, the defendant was given property by deceiving the victim respectively.

"2016 Highest 2342"

1. On April 5, 2016, the Defendant: (a) connected NAV to the Defendant’s house located in Seoyang-gu, Seoyang-gu, Seoyang-gu, Gyeonggi-do with NAE “E”; (b) posted a false statement on the following: (c) “The Defendant sold the right of cultural products of the local wifeland and piracy to 75-80% of the transaction; and (d) if the mobile right is issued on May 1, 201, the Defendant sent a gift certificate PIN number to the Defendant and sold the right of cultural products of 80,000 won to the victim H who made contact to the Defendant.” (d) The Defendant made a false statement on the following: (a) sold the right of cultural products of 640,000 won to the Defendant.

However, in order to raise the money, the Defendant had had intention to repeatedly acquire money from many unspecified persons by means of the same method, so even if receiving the money, there was no intention or ability to send the money to the victim on the date of promise.

Nevertheless, the defendant deceivings the victim as above, and such deceivings it from the victim to the new bank account under the name of the defendant on the same day, 640.

arrow