The defendant is innocent. The summary of this judgment shall be notified publicly.

1. On July 17, 2014, D, which was the trust of the C church located in Suwon District B, submitted a false statement to the effect that, in collusion with the Defendant and the F, who is the members of the same church, who are the members of the Suwon District Prosecutors' Office, the members of the same church, and that, on May 24, 201, he/she would repay the money that he/she would have borrowed the money that is short of the operating funds of the church," and thereafter, submitted a letter of complaint to the effect that he/she shall receive KRW 24,00,000 from the members of the church, which is the members of the same church in collusion with the Defendant and the former members of the Suwon District's Office, and the investigation of the suspects, E, and F was conducted at the Gyeonggi Western Police Station at that time, and on February 11, 2015, the said F was indicted for fraud, and was tried by the Suwon District Prosecutors' Office

However, in the process of the above investigation and trial, the defendant and the above E/F asserted that the above 24,000,000 won was not a loan but a unconstitutional loan, and there is a need to establish evidentiary materials to support this, and the defendant submitted the ledger of weekly revenue of the above church forged as follows, and further presented the following perjury during the trial process:

Around September 2, 2014, the Defendant asserted that he was asked questions about the nature of KRW 24,00,000 in relation to the above accusation case by following an investigation by the said sports personnel police station, and that he was asked about the above accusation case, as in E, it is just like in E., and then submitted the weekly revenue ledger on May 29, 201, stating the signature of G, which was the head of the finance division of the above church, as supporting materials, with E and E, to submit the evidentiary documents. On the same day, the Defendant and F submitted it to the sports personnel police station in the sports personnel division where he was the head of the finance division of the above church as well as the sports personnel division, which was the head of the finance division of the above church.

The head of the weekly revenue ledger stated that the audit contribution amount was KRW 4,933,00, and the construction contribution amount was KRW 20,310,000. However, this stated that the total of KRW 4,00,000 among the audit contribution amount was KRW 24,00,000 among the construction contribution amount, and KRW 20,000,000 among the construction contribution amount was D’s contribution amount, which could support the Defendant and the above E’s assertion. However, the Defendant was the above on May 29, 201.