The judgment of the court below is reversed.

The defendant shall be innocent.

1. The gist of the grounds for appeal is that the Defendant, in collaboration with the wife C, did not inflict any injury on the F inf by putting the F with his arms, such as satisfying, satisfy, etc.

2. Summary of the facts charged and the judgment of the court below

A. The summary of the facts charged and his wife C are E-S. E-S. E-S. E-S. in Eunpyeong-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government, and the victim F (e.g., 53 years old) is the denial of the above church pastor G.

At around 11:40 on June 8, 2013, the Defendant and C, on the front of the E branch of the E branch of the E branch of Eunpyeong-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government, and on the new branch of support for pastor G and pastors, on the ground that they are in dispute over church ownership issues, and on the ground that they are unable to prevent the victims, they were placed in physical fighting, and the Defendant, on both hand, carried out physical fighting, and the Defendant laid down the chest part of the victim in both hands, and the C was able to cut down both arms of the victim.

As a result, the Defendant assaulted the victim jointly with C, and inflicted injury on the victim, such as the left-hand gate, salt, etc. requiring treatment for about 14 days.

B. The lower court, based on the victim F, the police of H, the legal statement, the injury diagnosis statement, and other evidence of the lower court, found the Defendant guilty of the facts charged.

3. As evidence consistent with the facts charged in the judgment, F and H police and the court of the original instance have taken photographs and examinations of injury, etc., and the Defendant consistently from the police to the court of the original instance, which could cause many people to injure a person during the dispute over the entrance of a church, but at the same time, stated that C does not have any assaulted F.

However, the present situation at the time of the instant case was recorded on the cell phone screen, which was taken by I, who is the ctv camera and H, the main body of the church building and H, and the time different from the time when each of the above images was taken upon examining both F and H’s statements and other evidence.