The defendant is not guilty. The summary of the judgment against the defendant shall be published.

Punishment of the crime

【Criminal Records of Crimes】 On July 15, 2015, the Defendant was sentenced to a two-year suspended sentence of imprisonment for perjury at the Seoul Eastern District Court on August 15, 2015, and the said judgment became final and conclusive on April 29, 2016, and is currently under the grace period.

【Basic Facts】 The Defendant is a member of the C church located in Suwon-si B, and D is a member of the F church located in the division-gu E in the male-Nam-si.

On December 6, 2010, G, which is the head of the Defendant and D or F church, was 80 square meters out of the H 340 square meters (the site to be newly built of the C church) in the above F church office as the Defendant, and was donated 80 square meters to the Defendant, and entered into a contract for the new construction of the C church assets to take over the said land and the site to be newly built of the C church in the aggregate of KRW 1,545 million including the site amount of KRW 20,000,000,000,000 including the site amount of KRW 20,000,000,000. On December 18, 2010, after entering into a sales contract to increase the purchase price to KRW 1,83,069,00,000 according to the increase in the construction cost of the C church new construction works, on December 23, 2010.

On the other hand, on December 6, 2010 in the process of concluding the above new asset sales contract, the letter of resolution on the transfer of a new church under Defendant’s sole name (hereinafter “the letter of resolution 1”) was prepared by the Defendant and D’s joint name (hereinafter “the letter of resolution 2”), and the summary of the first letter was “the Defendant’s co-operation (co-operation) with the F church and will act as a pastor,” and the second letter was added to the above contents of the first letter of resolution, stating that “The C church sexuality was registered with the F church so that it can simultaneously establish a new church with the Defendant and D’s joint name.” The name was changed.

Since then, the defendant appointed the defendant as a joint pastor of the F church by D and G as the defendant, and entered into a sales contract for new C church assets with the above C church under the condition that the above C church is jointly convened, but did not fulfill the above conditions.