The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

Summary of Grounds for Appeal

As stated in the judgment of the court below, the defendant does not have any misunderstanding of D's title, or threateninger’s disease and intimidation, and the judgment of the court below which found the defendant guilty of the facts charged of this case is erroneous in the misapprehension of facts, which affected the conclusion of the judgment.

Judgment

Witness

According to the evidence duly adopted and examined by the lower court, such as E and D’s respective legal statements, etc., on April 17, 2012, on the ground that the Defendant moved the Defendant’s E in the street in front of Eunpyeong-gu Seoul, Seoul at around 00, he/she may sufficiently recognize the fact of intimidation to E by stating that E and Si expenses assaulted the Defendant’s parts of D during the dispute between E and E and Si expenses, and by speaking “Bara” as a dangerous object.

Therefore, the judgment of the court below that convicted the Defendant of the facts charged in this case is just, and there is no error of mistake of facts as alleged by the Defendant.

In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act since it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.