The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The gist of the grounds for appeal is that the Defendant did not have threatened the victim C with an antifluence, and there was no threat to the effect that tobacco would be "to be cut off by a cigarette in front of the victim," and the court below found the Defendant guilty of all the facts charged, and there was an error of law by misapprehending the facts of the judgment below.

2. According to the evidence duly admitted and examined by the court below, in light of the following, the victim C’s statement is consistent with the investigative agency from the court below to the court below’s judgment, specific points, the victim C’s statement cannot find any contradictions with the victim C’s statement, the victim D’s statement on the part of intimidation citing netism and tobacco is consistent with the above C’s statement, and the Defendant’s denial G statement that the Defendant provided the victims with the desire when the Defendant took advantage of the view at the time of the instant case at the court below’s trial, it can be acknowledged the facts charged of the instant case against the Defendant.

3. In conclusion, there is no appeal by the defendant, and it is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act. It is so decided as per Disposition.