A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not more than ten months.

Punishment of the crime

On April 29, 2015, the Defendant was sentenced to six months of imprisonment with labor for a violation of the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes at the Busan District Court on October 28, 2015. On February 4, 2016, the Defendant was sentenced to imprisonment with labor for a crime of intimidation at the Busan District Court on April 25, 2016 and completed the execution on February 25, 2016.

1. From March 25, 2016 to March 04:40 of the same day from March 25, 2016 to 05:30 of the same day, the Defendant: (a) the victim, who was demanded from the injured party, to calculate the drinking value at the E main point in the operation of the victim D's 1st underground floor in Busan Seo-gu C; (b) the victim, who was demanded from the injured party to pay the drinking value; and (c) the said victim, who was frighted to drink and fled, she shall be discarded down to the employee F of the household, “low fright to drink, fright,

“In doing so, as we see the said F as a counter-influor, I am fluor by threatening the said F, such as drinking and fluoring the cooling.

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with the victim's main business by force.

2. The Defendant interfered with the performance of special official duties, at the time, at the place, as described in paragraph (1) and at the same time, was subject to the foregoing action from the security guards H of the Busan Police Station G District of the Busan Police Station, who called to the site after receiving a report as described in paragraph (1) 1, and thereby was subject to the control of the above action, i.e., “the president’s annual algora,” and “the president’s lelebbly,” and “the head of this lebru, while taking a bath at this time, brucing the beer’s disease, which is a dangerous object, after breaking the beer’s disease in the above main room, and putting the beer’s slebru, which is a dangerous object, out of his hand, and embling it out with the Defendant’s item.”

The above H threatened the Defendant’s front of the Defendant with her large sound, and her left hand with her other shouldering slick slick slick slick sl.

Accordingly, the defendant carried dangerous objects and interfered with the police officer's legitimate execution of official duties on crime control.

Summary of Evidence

1. The defendant's person;