A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than eight months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

"2016 Highest 1168"

1. On February 27, 2016, from around 20:40 to 21:05 on the same day, the Defendant interfered with the business of the Defendant: (a) at the “E restaurant” restaurant operated by the victim D (the age of 57) located in Seo-gu, Daegu, Seo-gu; (b) returned to the ward; and (c) sought to follow alcohol to the customers on other tables; and (d) the victim who talks with the victim, “packs, sweet, sweet, this sweet, and this sweet,” and the victim who talks, interfered with the victim’s restaurant business by force.

2. On February 27, 2016, the Defendant interfered with the performance of official duties in a restaurant parking lot as seen above, the Defendant assaulted on the following: (a) on the part of the Defendant: (b) 11:05, that the Defendant avoided disturbance; (c) 112 reported the disturbance; and (d) expressed a large voice by the slope G belonging to the F District Unit of the Daegu Seo-gu Police Station, Daegu, which called the “E”); and (d) attempted to take a batch of the said G, a police official, into consideration, fat the batch and take a drinking face; and (e) obstructed the police official’s legitimate performance

The Defendant, on June 30, 2016, was charged with non-detained as a crime of interference with business with the business by the Seoggu District Court’s Branch on June 30, 2016, and is currently pending trial.

On August 5, 2016, from around 22:45 to 00:20 the following day, the Defendant entered the “J” restaurant managed by the victim I of the damage in Daegu Seo-gu, Daegu-gu, and requested his employee to provide alcohol, but the employee had already been withdrawn from the restaurant, thereby threatening his employee on the ground that he had already been doing so, and threatened his employee on the ground that he had already been doing so. The Defendant saw the customer who drinks alcohol on other table, and embling him with an appearance such as “this spule” or “this spule”, etc., and boomed the customer who entered the restaurant, and boomed him with a view to drinking expenses.

Therefore, when the victim demands that "I am the same, I will calculate it, and I am the same," it is called "I am why I am the chronia will be why we should calculate it, and why we should do."