logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 부산지방법원 2016.05.19 2016고단1295
공무집행방해
Text

Defendant

A shall be punished by imprisonment with prison labor for eight months and by imprisonment for six months.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. Defendant B’s sole crime committed on February 5, 2016, on the ground that around February 23:05, Defendant B destroyed the strawer in front of Busan Jin-gu C by hand with the strawer and caused damage to the strawer.

Therefore, it is reported to E who is a public official belonging to the Busan Police Station D District Police Station, where a taxi engineer is working in the vicinity, and the police officer is the above defendant.

While being observed by many people, the Defendant insulting the said police officer with the large voice of “a fluor, fluor, fluor, fluor, fluor, fluor, fluor, fluor of a fluor, fluor of a bitch,”

2. Defendant A’s sole crime received a report that the damage was inflicted on the property at the above time and place and obstructed the performance of official duties of the police officer with regard to the handling of the report by assaulting G bucks and G bucks, who are public officials belonging to the police officer of the Busan Busan Police Station F, and walking the back on several occasions.

3. The Defendants committed the joint crime of the Defendants at around 23:15 on the same day, at the Busan Police Station D District of Busan Police Station, which was arrested in the act of committing the crime as above, and the Defendant A, who was a public official belonging to the police belonging to the said District, prevented the disturbance, and Defendant A, by hand, committed assault, such as pushing the above police officer’s breath, flabing his flab, and flabing his left hand, and Defendant B, by hand, flabing the police officer’s flab and flabing his duty.

As a result, the Defendants conspired and interfered with the performance of duties related to the duties of police officers.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendants’ respective legal statements

1. Each police statement by E, G, and I;

1. Application of each statute on photographs;

1. Relevant Article of the Act and the choice of punishment for the crime;

A. Defendant A: Article 136(1) of the Criminal Act (Interference with the performance of public duties), Article 136(1), and Article 30 of the Criminal Act (Interference with the performance of public duties) of the Criminal Act, and Article 136(1), and Article 30 of the Criminal Act (Interference with the

B. Defendant B: Criminal Act.

arrow