Defendant shall be punished by a fine of 200,000 won.

If the defendant fails to pay the above fine, 50,000 won shall be one day.

Punishment of the crime

The defendant is a facility farmer who cultivates sattoma in Jeonyang-gun C. The defendant is a facility farmer who cultivates sattoma in Jeonyang-gun.

Pursuant to the Environment-Friendly Agriculture Fosterage Act, no person shall place an indication of eco-friendly agricultural product or a similar indication on an agricultural product that is not a certified product, or place an indication on a certified product differently from the details of the certification.

Nevertheless, on February 5, 2013, the Defendant, who cultivated general practices that are prohibited from shipping to environment-friendly agricultural products, sold 70 km (70 km) (70 km) (70 km) (70 km) (70 km) (700 g (7 g) (77 g) at the Busan Seo-gu wholesale market, with an eco-friendly agricultural product marked in 10 km printed in E: 10 g, which is packed in packing boxes, with an eco-friendly agricultural product marked in an agricultural product that is not a certified product.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. A statement of detection;

1. Data on the field survey of Gwangju Books and Wholesale Market;

1. A written confirmation of details of shipment of the full accommodation of a farm household, a statement of settlement of sales proceeds of a farm household, and a written confirmation of the farm household;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes on investigation reporting;

1. Subparagraph 2 of Article 25 and subparagraph 2 of Article 17-5 of the relevant Act on the Fostering of Environment-Friendly Agriculture concerning facts constituting an offense;

1. Articles 70 and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. It is so decided as per Disposition by the assent of all participating Justices on the grounds of sentencing under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act, such as the quantity of the soil sold in this case and the profits gained by the Defendant therefrom are relatively small, and there is no previous conviction in the same kind.