1. The Defendants jointly share KRW 7,500,000 with respect to the Plaintiff and KRW 5% per annum from August 16, 2017 to January 30, 2020.

1. Basic facts

A. On August 16, 2017, the Plaintiff (D) was treated by Defendant C, a doctor employed by Defendant B, and was treated by Defendant C.

B. Although there was suspected of cruel fluoral fluoral fluoral fluoral fluoral fluoral fluoral fluoral, Defendant C determined that the fluoral fluor’s fluoral fluoral fluoral flus

C. On August 16, 2017, Defendant C performed an operation (hereinafter “instant operation”) to remove cruel homicides, after partially anesthesia the Plaintiff performed the operation (hereinafter “instant operation”). The Plaintiff was found to have suffered damage to euthanal pathy in the process of removing cruel necks during the instant operation, and there was symptoms showing the fall in the sense of sense on the right side immediately after the instant operation.

In addition, as a result of the organizational inspection on the removed hye hye, it was judged that the gye hye was confirmed.

E. Since August 17, 2018, the Plaintiff received conservation treatment from Defendant C on the ground that the symptoms are not shown, and thus, the Plaintiff was subject to the implementation of negotiology at the F Hospital that was taken by Defendant C on October 26, 2017.

F. After the instant surgery, the Plaintiff was suffering from post-treatment, such as the reduction of the right upper corner and the decline of the calendar, etc., and there was a permanent disability of 16% at the rate of loss of labor capacity.

[Ground of recognition] The facts without dispute, Gap evidence 1-1-2, Gap evidence 1-2-1, 2, 3-3-1, 7-2, and each of the evidences Nos. 1, 3-2, and 3-7

2. Summary of the plaintiff's cause of claim

A. In implementing the instant surgery, Defendant C has to observe the patient’s condition closely in preparation for all risks during the surgery and take the best measures. As a result of an ultra-frequency diagnosis, it is possible for Defendant C to be a negorithy, so he/she has a duty of care to conduct the surgery on an on-site basis in mind that he/she is a negorithal species.