beta
Text
1. The plaintiff's claims against the defendants are all dismissed.
2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.
Reasons
1. Basic facts
A. The Plaintiff is a patient who was diagnosed with lung cancer at a F Hospital and was in operation at the E Hospital. 2) The Defendant Educational Foundation C is a legal entity operating the F Hospital, and Defendant B was a doctor who diagnosed the pulmonary cancer with the Plaintiff at the F Hospital.
3) Defendant E Hospital is a juristic person operating the E Hospital, and Defendant D is a doctor who performed the pulmonary cancer operation with the Plaintiff at the E Hospital. B. Around July 19, 2013, the Plaintiff took CT photography from the Institute of Gradioactive rays to undergo a health examination, and the Plaintiff was found to have been suspected of malutical salutical salutic salutic salute in the Plaintiff’s waste (consal salutic salute).
2) On July 22, 2013, the Plaintiff visited the F Hospital and received medical treatment from Defendant B. Since then, Defendant B issued to the Plaintiff a diagnosis that “non-small cell lung cancer and left side” was based on the result of organizational inspection, etc., on the basis of the result of the organization inspection. Defendant B recommended the Plaintiff to be hospitalized for the purpose of the determination and treatment of weapons on September 2, 2013. The Plaintiff provided medical records from the F Hospital that the Plaintiff would show medical treatment.
C. On September 3, 2013, the Plaintiff started to visit the E Hospital to undergo medical treatment from Defendant D after receiving medical treatment. Thereafter, Defendant D’s post-explosion, PET CT, and MRI tests against the Plaintiff on the ground that the Plaintiff’s lung cancer was not a remote range between brain and other organs, and on September 30, 2013, it was determined that the Plaintiff’s lung cancer was not a brain and other organs. As for the Plaintiff on September 30, 2013, the pulmonary resuscitation surgery is an operation to cut down the pulmonary cancer in a case where only one part of the pulmonary tissue was a flachi, limited to only one part of the pulmonary tissue (hereinafter “instant operation”).
(2) Defendant D had conducted the instant surgery on September 30, 2013, and in that process, found small plesying and plesying around the wall surrounding the operation department.
3. Defendant.