1. Of the judgment of the court of first instance, the part against the defendant exceeding the following amount ordered to be paid shall be revoked.

1. The facts following the facts do not conflict between the parties, or can be found in full view of Gap evidence Nos. 1, 3 through 7 (including branch numbers; hereinafter the same shall apply), Eul evidence Nos. 1 and 3, and the testimony of the witness C of the first instance trial as a whole.

On May 30, 2012, the main contents of the contract of this case are as follows: (a) high voltageA contract terms (B) industry(2) for each type of contract, 920kW, and (b) customer customer (Defendant) customer (C) customer (C) customer (625kWW capacity) customer (C) user (C) user of equipment 295kW change equipment and facilities 295kW change equipment and facilities for each type of contract (A) industrial(A), Defendant 295kW, C (consumer joint user) and the Plaintiff used electricity.

A. On April 1995, the Defendant entered into an electric utility use agreement with the Plaintiff at high voltageA 920kW, which entered into with the Plaintiff around April 1995, and entered into an electric utility use agreement with the Plaintiff on May 25, 2012, with the following content: (a) the Defendant entered into an electric utility use agreement with the Plaintiff on May 25, 2012:

(hereinafter “instant contract”). After that, the Defendant changed the terms and conditions of the instant contract into high voltageA 285kW on April 18, 2014, and had been supplied with electricity and used by the Plaintiff for the same content until June 2016.

B. On June 2016, the Plaintiff determined that among the instant contracts, C violated the Plaintiff’s basic terms and conditions of supply of electricity (hereinafter “instant terms and conditions”) to the Defendant and joint-use customers, as a result of on-site verification of the instant factory.