A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than one year and six months.

Punishment of the crime

On January 12, 2005, the Defendant was sentenced to a suspended sentence of six months for larceny at the Seoul Central District Court on July 26, 201, and sentenced to a fine of five million won for larceny at the Seoul Central District Court on July 26, 201, and was sentenced to a suspended sentence of six months for larceny at the Seoul Central District Court on August 16, 201, and was sentenced to a fine of three million won for larceny at the Seoul Northern District Court on November 16, 2012, and was sentenced to a fine of eight million won for larceny at the Seoul Northern District Court on July 26, 2013.

Defendant habitually,

1. Around 05:00 on November 16, 2013, at the convenience store located in Seongbuk-gu, Seongbuk-gu, Seongbuk-gu, Sungnam-si, the victim E, an employee of the convenience store, uses only one mobile phone unit in the amount of KRW 1,000,000 at the market price of the victim’s possession, which was located on the part of the convenience store located on the part of the victim E, and steals it;

2. Around 00:18 on December 23, 2013, at G convenience stores located in Seongbuk-gu, Seongbuk-gu, Seongbuk-gu, Sungnam-si, one gallon juslopic juscopic juscopic juscopic juscopic juscopic juscopic juscopic juscopic juscopics equivalent to KRW 800,000,

3. From December 31, 2013, around 02:30 on December 31, 2013, LG G2 mobile phones equivalent to KRW 1,00,000 and KRW 1,00,000, at the market price of the victim K owned by the victim K, which was set set set set at a soup bank located in Seongbuk-gu, Seongbuk-gu, Seongbuk-gu, Sungnam-gu, Seoul.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Examination protocol of the accused by prosecution;

1. Each police interrogation protocol against the accused;

1. Each police statement of H, E, K, and L;

1. Confirmation of occurrence reports and fingerprinting of theft cases;

1. Each photograph, CCTV photograph, and on-site photograph;

1. Previous convictions in judgment: Criminal records and investigation reports (reports attached to the same criminal records and investigation reports);

1. Habituality of judgment: Application of Acts and subordinate statutes recognizing dampness in light of the records of each crime, the frequency of crimes, the frequency of crimes, and the fact that the same kind of crimes are repeated several times in a planned manner;

1. Relevant Articles of the Criminal Act and specific crimes as to the choice of punishment.