beta
Text
A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.
Reasons
Punishment of the crime
[Criminal Justice] On April 25, 2018, the Defendant was sentenced to six months of imprisonment for a crime of fraud at the Sungnam Branch of Suwon District Court on April 25, 2018 and completed the execution of the sentence in the Ansan Prison on October 16, 2019.
【Criminal Facts】
1. On November 29, 2019, the Defendant: (a) 19:45 on November 29, 2019, 201; (b) committed assault and assault and assault committed “D” operated by the victim C (hereinafter referred to as “D”); (c) the Defendant had the same attitude that the Defendant would normally pay the price even if he did not have any intent or ability to pay the price due to the lack of money at the time; and (d) ordered the Defendant, she had the same attitude that he would pay the price due to the absence of money at the time; and (e) ordered the Defendant, such as double jugs, spaths, and spawn, taking a bath for the victim under the influence of alcohol; and (e) was frighted, she was frighted, such as spawning, spawning, and galging the tables, and spawning theme.
Ultimately, the Defendant, by deceiving the victim as above, obtained food equivalent to the total market value of KRW 13,00 from the victim and interfered with the victim's operation of the restaurant by force for about 45 minutes, and assaulted the victim.
2. On December 8, 2019, at around 18:13, 2019, the Defendant: (a) expressed that “G” operated by the Victim F (F) on the first floor of the building E in Sungnam-si, Sungnam-si; (b) the Defendant would have paid the price due to the lack of money at the time; (c) ordered be called “Chewing and visible” for the reason that the victim would have been asked again; and (d) expressed that the Defendant would have expressed a desire to “Chewing” to customers on the ground that the customer was able to take a bath in the form of mixed-type form; and (e) expressed that the Defendant would have been able to take the cost due to the absence of any intent or ability to pay the price due to the absence of money at the time; and (e) expressed that the Defendant would have been able to take the cost due to the absence of any intention or ability to pay the price due to the absence of money at the time.
Ultimately, the Defendant deceivings the victim as above.