logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울고등법원 2015.04.16 2014나36858
저작물침해금지 등
Text

The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.

Expenses for appeal shall be borne by the plaintiff.

Purport of claim and appeal

The judgment of the first instance.

Reasons

1. The reasoning of the court’s explanation concerning this case, such as accepting the judgment of the court of first instance, is as follows 2. The relevant part of the judgment of the court of first instance is modified as stated in the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance, except for supplementing the judgment as stated in the following 3. Thus, it is acceptable in accordance with the main sentence of Article

2. Revised parts

(a) Deleted.

(b) modify “A” of the 7th six parallels to “Plaintiff”;

(c) revise “cost” of 10,000 won for 7 pages to “cost of 1.3 million won”;

D. Subsequent to the 7th 11th 11th am, the following was added to the Plaintiff, on June 22, 2008, and the Plaintiff introduced the Ambabaner with the Plaintiff on June 22, 2008, and the Plaintiff added the name of “J” to the set, in which B, planned the shopping bags of the Ambabag by using the photographs of paragraph 118.

E. 8. 8. 5 5 1. The plaintiff modified the “n.e.,” as follows. 5 5 1. 5 1. The plaintiff made the Plaintiff photographed his English name in blank to B and put it into the bottom of H “H” cop.

As to this, the plaintiff

F. From 8 to 3 others, it is reasonable to conclude that, in light of the above facts acknowledged prior to the amendment, the Plaintiff: (a) used the instant pictures in the products (regional fishery specialty scenarios) packing materials, etc. planned by B in return for the purchase of the Plaintiff’s pictures and the subsidization of the Jeju-do shooting expenses; or (b) granted at least implied permission to publish them in the Defendant’s online shopping mall for the promotion of the product’s advertising.

(In light of the relationship between the plaintiff and B, it is difficult to view that the price paid by B is unfair or exceptional. The plaintiff's assertion is without merit.

3. Supplementary to the determination (the Plaintiff’s assertion) is as follows: (a) the Plaintiff and the Defendant’s witness B, either by e-mail and web e-mail, respectively.

arrow