logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
Text
Reasons
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 의정부지방법원 2013.07.18 2012고정2878
명예훼손
Text

Defendants shall be punished by a fine of KRW 1,000,000.

The Defendants did not pay each of the above fines.

Reasons

Criminal facts

1. At around 10:30 on March 19, 2012, Defendant A made a statement to the 1st floor conference room of EFF (hereinafter “EF”) located in Gyeonggi-gun, Gyeonggi-do (hereinafter “EF”), Defendant A damaged the victim’s reputation by openly pointing out false facts, despite the fact that the victim F (hereinafter “victim”) did not unfairly threaten G, Defendant A, including 6 employees of EF, 6 directors, 2 auditors, etc., and 14 members of EF were present at a regular board of directors meeting, and 7.5 million won was wrongfully received.”

2. Defendant B

A. In the conference room for the first floor EF in Gyeonggi-gun, Gyeonggi-do from April 11, 2012 to December 00 of the same day, Defendant B, by alleging false facts, told Defendant B, at the meeting room for the first floor of EF in Gyeonggi-gun, the victim received KRW 7,500,00 according to lawful procedures with the approval of the president of the said agricultural cooperative, but the victim received approximately KRW 25,000,00 from around 11:0,000,000 from around 11:0 to 12:0,000, “The victim was dismissed while working in Hart, and caused injury to agricultural cooperative because the victim was unfairly collected KRW 7,50,00 for the period of dismissal for three months.”

As a result, Defendant B damaged the reputation of the victim by openly pointing out false facts.

B. Defendant B’s defamation by statement of fact read, from April 4, 2012 to 12:00 of the same day, that “The victim is a person who was discharged from work as at the time when he/she works in the EFT at the first floor conference room for the EFE located in Gyeonggi-gun, Gyeonggi-do, and approximately twenty-five (25) members, including the former and incumbent executive officers of the said Nonghyup.”

As a result, Defendant B damaged the reputation of the victim by openly pointing out facts.

Summary of Evidence

1. Legal statement of witness F in the third protocol of the trial;

1. Partial statement of witness G in the third protocol of trial;

1. Some police interrogation protocol against the Defendants

1. Each of the police officers with respect to G and I.

arrow