logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대전고등법원 2005. 9. 28. 선고 2005나6318 판결
[조치무효확인][미간행]
Plaintiff and appellant

Plaintiff 1 and six others (Attorney Han-hee, Counsel for the plaintiff-appellant)

Defendant, Appellant

National Federation of Korea (Attorney Kim Jong-hoon, Counsel for defendant-appellant)

Conclusion of Pleadings

September 7, 2005

The first instance judgment

Daejeon District Court Decision 2004Gahap10699 Decided June 9, 2005

Text

1. The plaintiffs' appeal is dismissed.

2. The appeal costs are assessed against the plaintiffs.

Purport of claim and appeal

Of the judgment of the court of first instance, the part against the defendant is revoked. On September 14, 2004, it is confirmed that the defendant's disciplinary action against the plaintiffs against the co-defendant (the name of a unit union omitted), credit union (hereinafter referred to as "credit union") of the first instance court on September 14, 2004 and corrective action against the plaintiffs and executive improvement measures are invalid

Reasons

1. Quotation of judgment of the first instance;

The reasoning of the court's reasoning concerning this case is as follows: "The 5 lines and 5 lines each " Sep. 15, 2004" shall be read as " Sep. 14, 2004" under the 5 lines and 12 lines below the 3th judgment of the court of first instance; the 5th 12 lines and 14 lines "the plaintiff 1 shall be the time the criminal judgment becomes final and conclusive in the case of the plaintiff 1; the remaining plaintiffs shall have the right as an executive officer of the defendant (the name of the unit union omitted) by January 25, 2005 where a new executive officer of the defendant (the name of the unit union omitted) may have exercised the right as an executive officer of the new consultation by January 25, 2005." Except as otherwise stated in the judgment of the court of first instance, it shall be quoted as it is in accordance with Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act.

2. Conclusion

Therefore, the judgment of the first instance court is justifiable, and the plaintiffs' appeal against this is dismissed. It is so decided as per Disposition.

Judges Jeong Young-chul (Presiding Judge)

arrow