logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울북부지방법원 2015.07.14 2014고단3088
사기미수등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for one year.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

In collusion with the separate co-defendant D (hereinafter referred to as the "D"), E, and nameless winners (F), from October 209, the defendant's office located in Dongdaemun-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government and 501 has opened a lending brokerage company using the registration certificate in the name of H from October 2009 to evaluate the credit of the loan applicants, and recruited the loan applicants, the defendant received the loan application documents from the loan applicants, such as resident registration certificates and certificates of personal seal impression, and reported them to D, and D, upon the defendant's instruction, f, f, forged the above loan application documents, using the above resident registration certificate, etc., and issued them to the loan applicants through D, and E received the loan equivalent to the loan in the name of the loan applicants by submitting a forged employment certificate, etc. according to the defendant's instructions, etc. to the bank.

1. Forgery of private documents under the name of the corporation I, uttering of falsified documents, and attempted fraud;

A. A. Around December 2, 2009, the Defendant: (a) reported the loan advertisement in Dongdaemun-gu Seoul, Dongdaemun-gu G and 501; and (b) reported the loan advertisement to J, saying, “A means of receiving a loan from the bank even if he/she has not repaid the communication fee of 2 million won; (b) has been obtained from J; (c) received the loan application documents, such as resident registration certificates, certificates of personal seal impression, and family relation certificates, from J; and (d) said documents were sent back to D; and (e) said D again forged the loan application documents of J to F by using the above J’s loan application documents.

Accordingly, the Defendant, in collusion with D, E, etc., forged the “re-employment certificate” in the name of the company I, which is a private document related to the certificate of fact, and the “tax withholding receipt” for earned income.

(b).

arrow