logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 2016.09.01 2015가단124633
손해배상(기)
Text

1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by each person;

Reasons

1. Basic facts

A. In the name-free boxes (title B), C, D, and E forged a sales contract on real estate owned by another person; forged the resident registration certificate of the third person; forged the third person’s resident registration certificate; completed the registration of ownership transfer of false real estate based on the certificate of personal seal impression; and acquired money by obtaining a loan as security; in the name-free boxes (title B), C planned the forgery of identification card and the whole crime; D planned to obtain a certificate of personal seal impression; and D conspired to act as a real estate owner; and E conspired to act as a real estate owner.

B. Around April 2014, E had a photograph attached to D, D had a personal registration certificate for the Plaintiff, D had a name-free box (one name B), and the name-free box (one name-free box B) attached a photograph of E to plastic board cut off from the French to the string of the resident registration certificates, attached the Plaintiff’s name, resident registration number, address, and affixed the issuer’s position and official seal, and forged the Plaintiff’s resident registration certificate for the Plaintiff.

D If the F had the F obtain a certificate of the personal seal impression, the certificate of the personal seal impression attached with the intent to make the Plaintiff engage in the work through fingerprint sampling was forged more than one copy.

C. On July 3, 2014, around 16:25, F visited the Geumcheon-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government Seocho-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government Dong Office for Real Estate Sale and applied for issuance of a certificate of personal seal impression for Real Estate Sale in the name of the Plaintiff.

G public officials of the defendant who were in charge of issuing the certificate of seal impression at the time confirmed that the date of issuance of the resident registration certificate presented by the F is normal, and F had F substitute F with the fingerprint of his fingers in the fingerprinting machine.

F The F is a fingerprinter who has his fingered with D, etc. after having his fingerprinted by the plaintiff's fingerprinted with D, etc., put his fingers in his fingers. Therefore, the F is a fingerprinted with his fingers.

arrow