logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울북부지방법원 2016.09.01 2014고단3088 (1)
사기미수등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for one year.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

The Defendant conspired with the joint Defendant B (Adjudication; hereinafter, hereinafter, hereinafter, hereinafter referred to as “B”), C, and the name influence (hereinafter referred to as “D”), and from October 2009 to October 501, the Defendant evaluated the credit of loan applicants by offering loan brokerage companies using the F lending registration certificate in the name of Dongdaemun-gu Seoul E and 501, and by soliciting loan applicants. B received the loan application documents, such as resident registration certificates and certificates of seal impression, from the loan applicants and received the loan application documents from the loan applicants, and the Defendant read the loan application documents to “D”, and “D”, using the resident registration certificate, etc., forged the employment certificate of loan applicants and the employment income withholding receipt, and C submitted the forged employment certificate, etc. to the bank in accordance with the direction of the loan applicants, and acquired it by receiving the loan amount corresponding to the loan loan in the name of the loan applicants.

1. Forgery of private documents, uttering of falsified documents, and attempted fraud in the name of G Co., Ltd.;

A. A. Around December 2, 2009, Article 2 of the Private Document Forgery B provides that “A loan from a bank is provided even if a bank does not pay any of the communications charges of KRW 2,00,000,000” to H who reported the loan advertisement and found the loan advertisement. Around December 2, 2009, H received the loan application documents from H, including resident registration certificates, certificates of personal seal impression, and family relation certificates, and then the Defendant dried the Defendant into “D”, using the documents for the loan application of H, and forged the loan application documents of H by using the document for the loan application of H in the name of “D”, “D”, and the receipt for wage and salary income withholding, etc.

Accordingly, the Defendant, in collusion with B, C, etc., forged the “re-employment certificate” in the name of G, a private document related to the certificate of fact, and the “the receipt for withholding tax on labor income.”

(b).

arrow