logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2020.01.10 2019고합1000
성매매알선등행위의처벌에관한법률위반(성매매알선등)등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than one year and six months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for three years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. From June 20, 2019 to September 3, 2019, the Defendant violated the Act on the Punishment of Arrangement of Commercial Sex Acts, Etc. (the Act on the Punishment of Commercial Sex Acts, Etc.) committed an act of arranging, soliciting, inducing, or forcing an unspecified person to commit an act of sexual intercourse or other similar sexual intercourse in return for receiving or promising money, goods, or other property benefits from an unspecified number of customers. However, around June 20, 2019, the Defendant assisted an act of sexual intercourse with D and once with B, who was found to receive money from a man who was found to engage in sexual intercourse in sexual intercourse in order to engage in sexual intercourse in the said “C”, and arranged the act of sexual intercourse with the said D, etc. by receiving an amount of KRW 100,000 to KRW 260,00 from an unspecified number of customers from the above date to September 3, 2019.

Accordingly, the defendant committed commercial sex acts such as arranging commercial sex acts.

2. No person who violates the Immigration Control Act shall employ any foreigner who has no status of sojourn eligible for employment activities;

Nevertheless, the defendant from June 20, 2019 to the same year.

9. By March 9, 200, the Defendant, as described in paragraph (1), employed the “C” sexual traffic business establishments run by the Defendant, knowing that the Defendant did not have the status of stay eligible for job-seeking activities as B, E, and F of Brazil’s nationality.

As a result, the defendant employed a foreigner who does not have the status of sojourn eligible for employment activities.

3. The Defendant, in violation of the Act on the Control of Narcotics, etc. (marijuth) handled marijuana as follows, although he is not a person handling narcotics:

On February 10, 2019, the Defendant decided to purchase marijuana from G, and transferred 50,000 won of the purchase price for marijuana to the Kakao Bank Account in the name of G on February 10, 2019, and then operated by G in Ulsan-gu H in February 2019.

arrow