logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울동부지방법원 2018.08.03 2018고단1639
성매매알선등행위의처벌에관한법률위반(성매매알선등)등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

"2018 Highest 1639"

1. Violation of the Act on the Punishment, etc. of Acts of Arranging-gu, Seoul Metropolitan Government (e.g., brokerage, etc. of sexual traffic) operated a sexual traffic business establishment under the trade name, such as Gangdong-gu, Seoul Metropolitan Government Building, D, etc. which is a woman engaged in sexual traffic with the nationality of the mother country, and by having D receive KRW 1.90,00 won in return for the above business establishment around March 29, 2018 from F, a guest who had found the above business establishment around 23:00, and had D do sexual intercourse with F and twice.

2. No person who violates the Immigration Control Act shall employ any foreigner having no status of sojourn eligible for employment activities;

The Defendant: (a) operated a person operating a commercial sex acts as set forth in paragraph (1); (b) from March 28, 2018 to March 29, 2018, the Defendant employed a person with the nationality of Thailand, who did not have the status of stay to engage in job-seeking activities at the said establishment, to pay half of the chemical value at the time of the commercial sex acts in remuneration; and (c) employed a person engaging in commercial

"2018 Highest 1893"

1. Around February 17, 2018, the Defendant, in violation of the Act on the Punishment, etc. of Acts of Arranging sexual traffic (such as brokerage, etc. of sexual traffic) employed a G, which is a female sexual traffic with the native nationality, to find the said business through the Internet site “H,” around February 19, 2018, he received KRW 70,00 in return for sexual traffic from I, a guest who had found the said business through the Internet site, and let the said G do the said I and sexual intercourse, thereby engaging in commercial sex acts.

2. No person who violates the Immigration Control Act shall employ any foreigner having no status of sojourn eligible for employment activities;

Nevertheless, the Defendant: (a) operated a commercial sex acts business establishment as described in the foregoing paragraph (1); (b) from February 12, 2018 to February 19, 2018, the Defendant employed a commercial sex acts to pay half of the specifications at the time of commercial sex acts to G of Thailand nationality who did not have the status of stay to work in the said business establishment from February 19, 2018 to February 19, 2018

Summary of Evidence

1. The defendant's oral statement;

arrow