Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 2,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Punishment of the crime

The defendant and A are the relationship between the dynamic line and the latter.

The defendant, without the intention or ability to arrange sexual traffic, has induced to arrange sexual traffic for unspecified males as if they act as the counter-party to sexual traffic without the intention or ability to arrange sexual traffic, and has solicited to flee by receiving the price in advance.

On May 30, 2017, around 23:30 on May 30, 2017, the Defendant posted a dumpinging dumping flusium in Busan Dong-dong, and then divided the dialogue with the victim as if he/she would arrange sexual traffic, and around 23:50 on May 30, 2017, the Defendant demanded the victim and the victim to pre-paid sexual traffic payment prior to the departure of the subway located in Nam-gu, Busan.

However, as the victim refuses to pay in advance, the "Btel", which is the place of sexual traffic, should not be paid by the "C chief office (D)".

D was aware of the above circumstances around 00:30 on May 31, 2017, 2017, and the victim in the future of the 'Btel' said 'Btel' said 'Btel' was "A head of the Gu, who is a female head of Btel 701, without a mold."

However, even if the commercial sex acts are paid, there was no intention or ability to arrange the commercial sex acts women.

Nevertheless, it received 140,000 won in cash from the injured party.

As a result, the defendant conspired with D to deceiving the victim and received a delivery equivalent to the same amount.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. A protocol concerning the examination of suspects of D;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes of each police statement protocol to E;

1. Article 347(1) and Article 347(1) of the Criminal Act and Article 347 of the same Act concerning facts constituting an offense, the selection of fines;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. The reason for sentencing of Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act with regard to the crime of this case, the circumstances following the crime, the extent of damage, the Defendant’s age, and the records of the crime, etc., are taken into account equally, set the sentence as ordered by the Criminal Procedure Act;