1. Of the judgment of the court of first instance, the part against the plaintiff corresponding to the money ordered to be paid in addition to the following shall be revoked.

1. Occurrence, etc. of liability for damages;

A. Basic facts 1) On September 21, 2013, the Defendant: (a) had been sentenced to two years of suspension of the execution of six months of imprisonment for the instant harmful act on August 22, 2014; (b) had been sentenced to two years of suspension of the execution of six months of imprisonment for the crime of injury on the part of the Defendant on the ground that the Plaintiff, the head of the C Village, who was the head of the C Village, stated that the Defendant “hon only opposed to the Donge four meetings” was the Defendant on the ground that “hon.” (hereinafter “the instant harmful act”). The Defendant appealed against the judgment dismissing the appeal on February 6, 2015 (Cheongju District Court Decision 2013Ma916), but the said judgment became final and conclusive around that time.

[Ground of recognition] The fact that there is no dispute, entry of Gap's No. 8 (including virtual number), and purport of whole pleading

B. The Plaintiff’s injury caused by the instant harmful act is based on the following facts: (a) evidence Nos. 1 and 8; and (b) the inquiry results and the entire purport of the argument by the D Hospital on February 17, 2016 to the D Hospital of this Court; (c) the Defendant, as the instant harmful act, found the Plaintiff to have inflicted injury on the Plaintiff at the right level, outside and outside of the 8 weeks of treatment; and (d) 4 weeks of treatment. Accordingly, the Defendant, on December 27, 2011, did not assert the causation between the Plaintiff’s injury and the 15 weeks of treatment at E Hospital and the 2,3 metrosium, and the 2,5th dental clinic and G dental clinic around September 2013; and (d) there was lack of causation between the Plaintiff and the above harmful act and the 25th dental clinic.