The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

Litigation costs shall be borne by the plaintiff.

1. Details of the disposition;

A. The plaintiff entered the Army on September 30, 1994 and was discharged from office on December 5, 1996.

B. The Plaintiff was determined on November 23, 2004 as follows: (a) on December 1994, when serving in the military; (b) on April 1995, on the ground that he was injured by being injured by being injured by being injured by the special tactical training (total of these training; hereinafter “instant training”); and (c) on November 23, 2004, on the following grounds: (a) on the application for registration of a person of distinguished service to the State, the Plaintiff was determined as follows: (a) No. 4-5 of the plin escape test; (b) No. 5-6, 6-7 of the plin escape test; (c) No. 4-5 of the plin escape test; and (d) No. 4-5 of the plin-le-le-le-le-le-le-le-le-le-le-le-le-le-le-le-s

C. On September 27, 2017, the Plaintiff filed a new application for registration of a person who rendered distinguished services to the State by asserting the aforementioned reasons.

On May 10, 2018, the Board of Patriots and Veterans Entitlement opened on May 10, 2018 deliberated and decided on the following: “The part of the “Isk-in and sk-in sk-in sk-in skn skn skn skn skn skn skn skn skn skn skn skn skn skn skn skn skn skn skn skn skn skn skn skn skn skn skn skn skn skn skn skn skn skn skn skn skn skn skn skn skn skn skn skn sn s

Accordingly, on June 14, 2018, the Defendant rendered a determination that constitutes the requirements for a person of distinguished service to the State with respect to “non-competing, non-competing, non-competing, and satisfaction.” However, the Defendant’s determination on the requirements for a person of distinguished service to the State and the person eligible for veteran’s compensation with respect to “Plaping, escape evidence No. 4-5, 5-6, and 6-7,” respectively.