logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2019.10.17 2014가단5296453
손해배상(기)
Text

1. The Defendant’s KRW 83,80,410 as well as 5% per annum from October 21, 2010 to October 17, 2019 to the Plaintiff.

Reasons

1. Basic facts

A. On October 11, 2010, the Plaintiff (D) was hospitalized in Yangsan National University Hospital (hereinafter “Defendant Hospital”) operated by the Defendant around October 13, 2010, when it was confirmed that the Plaintiff (D) was in the form of a dubu and the dubu was in the form of a dubu, and that the dubu was in the form of a dubu, as a result of the examination.

B. On October 20, 2010, the medical personnel of the Defendant Hospital planned the Plaintiff to perform a flag-pat-pat-pat-pat-pat-pat-pat-pat-pat-pat-pat-pat-pat-pat-pat-pat-pat-pat-pat-pat-pat-pat-pat-pat-pat-pat-pat-pat-pat-pat-pat-pat-pat-pat-pat-pat-pat-pat

While the U.S. medical personnel outside the Defendant Hospital confirmed that the Plaintiff’s luminous damage was inflicted on while conducting an dratical dratical dratical dratical dratical ratical ratical ratical ratical ratical ratical ratical ratical ratical ratical ratical raticals

C. On October 27, 2010, the medical personnel of the Defendant Hospital performed luminous surgery to the Plaintiff, and determined that there was no opinion as long as there was no opinion, and removed the urology.

However, on November 12, 2010, the Plaintiff showed symptoms of gold, and as a result, on November 12, 2010, the Plaintiff confirmed the luminous-Quality Mono-Ginal.

On May 27, 2011, the medical personnel of the Defendant Hospital performed the luminous-Quality Correction surgery to the Plaintiff. However, the Plaintiff was found to have continued to have caused the symptoms of the brush even thereafter, and on August 4, 2011, the results of the brush test conducted around the brush test conducted around August 4, 201.

On May 16, 2012, the Plaintiff received luminous-Quality Removal surgery at F Hospital.

E. The Plaintiff is currently in the state of the decline in light of the current brupt and net response, there is a severe physical exercise or activity, and there is a symptoms of pharmacologic, and there is a need for a test and pharmacologic treatment for future observation.

[Ground of recognition] The absence of dispute, entry of Gap evidence 2 through 6, and the result of the request for physical appraisal to the G Hospital Head of this Court.

arrow