logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대법원 2015. 09. 24. 선고 2015두44400 판결
(심리불속행) 거래 실례가 있다고 하더라도 그 거래가액이 객관적 교환가치를 적정하게 반영하지 못하는 경우 시가라고 할 수 없음[국패]
Case Number of the immediately preceding lawsuit

Seoul High Court 2014Nu64423 (2015.06)

Title

(Trialless Conduct) Even if there is a transaction example, if the transaction value is not adequately reflected in the objective exchange value, it shall not be deemed the market value.

Summary

(The main point of view) The shares of this case calculated by the supplementary evaluation method of the Inheritance Tax and Gift Tax Act are erroneous on the ground that, even if the value of the apartment sale is the actual transaction value, such transaction value cannot be deemed the market value if it is not adequately reflected the objective exchange value.

Cases

2015Du4400 Revocation of Disposition of Imposing gift tax

Plaintiff-Appellant

xAA

Defendant-Appellee

Head of Seocho Tax Office

Judgment of the lower court

Seoul High Court Decision 2014Nu64423 Decided May 6, 2015

Text

The appeal is dismissed.

The costs of appeal are assessed against the defendant.

Reasons

All of the records of this case and the judgment of the court below and the grounds of appeal were examined, but the argument on the grounds of appeal by the appellant falls under Article 4 of the Act on Special Cases Concerning the Procedure of Appeal, and therefore, the appeal is dismissed pursuant to Article 5 of the above Act. It is so decided as per

arrow