logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 광주고등법원(전주) 2015.01.15 2014나678
소유권이전등기
Text

1. The plaintiff's appeal against the defendants is dismissed in entirety.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

purport, purport, and.

Reasons

1. The reasoning of the court’s explanation concerning the instant case is as follows: (a) the relevant part of the judgment of the court of the first instance is identical to the reasoning of the judgment of the court of the first instance, in addition to the use of the following part of the judgment of the court of the first instance as stated in paragraph (2). Therefore, it is citing

2. Of the judgment of the court of first instance, each of the “construction by Defendant Thai” in Section 7 of Chapter 5 shall be applied to each of the “Defendant Thai House”.

Part VI of the judgment of the court of first instance shall be " March 9, 2012" in Part VI of the judgment of the court of first instance as " March 9, 2012 and March 1, 2013."

3. If so, the plaintiff's claim against the defendants is justified within the above scope of recognition, and the remaining claims are dismissed as it is without merit. The judgment of the court of first instance is justified with this conclusion. Thus, the plaintiff's appeal against the defendants is dismissed as it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.

arrow