logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울고등법원 2017.03.31 2016나2057435
물품대금
Text

1. All appeals by the Defendants are dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal are assessed against the Defendants.

3. The plaintiff's succession to the lawsuit.

Reasons

The reasoning of this court's judgment citing the judgment of the court of first instance is as follows, and thus, it is acceptable in accordance with the main sentence of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act.

In the third part of the judgment of the first instance, “Plaintiff” was added to “Plaintiff (the number of Co., Ltd., a stock company, was absorbed into fire extinguishing on June 30, 2016, which was pending in the lawsuit of the first instance, and accordingly, fire extinguishing Co., Ltd. took over the legal proceedings at the trial; hereinafter “Plaintiff” regardless of whether it was before or after the merger).”

The "G" in Part 3, 7, 8, and 5 of the first instance judgment shall be applied to the "J", respectively.

In the first instance judgment, the "471,396,550 won" of the first instance judgment shall be written with "471,396,650 won".

If so, the judgment of the court of first instance is legitimate, and all appeals by the defendants are dismissed, but the decision of the court of first instance was modified to pay the money to the plaintiff, who is the party taking the lawsuit, and the goods are delivered in accordance with the plaintiff's taking over the lawsuit, so it is so decided as per Disposition.

arrow