logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울고등법원 2010. 06. 10. 선고 2009누25042 판결
특수관계법인에게 위장계열사를 통한 우회적 자금대여행위는 부당행위계산 부인대상임[국승]
Case Number of the immediately preceding lawsuit

Seoul Administrative Court 2008Guhap31666 ( July 16, 2009)

Case Number of the previous trial

Cho High Court Decision 2007Du2391 (Law No. 8, 2008)

Title

Loans bypassing to a related corporation through a disguised affiliated company are subject to rejection of wrongful calculation.

Summary

A disguised affiliated company or disguised affiliated company is an illegal act of lending funds to a person with special interest by taking into account the fact that a corporation has not actually paid any interest after lending funds to a person with special interest, that a disguised affiliated company has no ability to repay debts, and that the absence of claims and obligations is confirmed by the corporation and a person with special interest through court adjustment.

The decision

The contents of the decision shall be the same as attached.

Text

1. The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.

2. Costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Purport of claim and appeal

The judgment of the first instance shall be revoked. The Defendant’s revocation of the disposition on the Plaintiff’s bonus income of 2,851,560,01 won in the business year 2001 with the income earner KimA as of March 26, 2007 and the bonus income of 2,608,009,001 won in the business year 2,574,790,621 won in the business year 2003, and the bonus income of 2,626,681,940 won in the business year 2004, and the bonus income of 2,626,681,940 won in the business year 204, and the bonus income of 1,972,416,643 won in the business year 206, and the bonus income of 1,238,239,60 won in the business year 206 shall be all revoked.

Reasons

The court's explanation of this case is the same as the part of the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance. Thus, it can be accepted by Article 8 (2) of the Administrative Litigation Act and the main sentence of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act.

Therefore, the judgment of the first instance court is legitimate, and the plaintiff's appeal is dismissed as it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.

arrow