A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not more than ten months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date of the final judgment.

Punishment of the crime

The Defendant, who was residing in Gyeonggi-gun-gun C, borrowed KRW 2.5 million from neighboring residents D on January 7, 2013, but was subject to provisional seizure due to the failure to pay it, and was subject to bad faith appraisal to D;

1. On March 29, 2013, from around 19:12 to 19:22 of the same day, the police officer called e-mail on three occasions at the Defendant’s residence and called e-mail and called e-mail on three occasions under the influence of alcohol, and reported i.e., “whether or not a police officer works”, i.e., “at the time of his/her house,” and ii) “at the time of his/her house,” and the police officer F, who is the police officer of the E-com box, and the police officer G sent to the Defendant’s residence, thereby obstructing the above two police officers from performing their legitimate duties by deceptive means;

2. Obstruction of the performance of official duties by deceptive means;

A. On May 22, 2013, around 19:23, 2013, the Defendant’s residence was committed on May 22, 2013, and the fact was not committed by D, and the Defendant did not wish to commit the Defendant, and instead, D calls to the E box two times for the purpose of criminal punishment despite having the Defendant expressed his desire to D, and falsely reported “D would have been punished as a crime of insult.” On the other hand, D was sent to the Defendant’s residence by the police officer in charge of the E box, the police officer in charge of the E box, and the Assistant H was called to the Defendant’s residence, with the aim of having the Defendant be subject to criminal punishment, and at the same time, interfered with legitimate performance of duties concerning the duties of the police officer in relation to the reported case by deceptive means.

B. On June 11, 2013, the Defendant’s residence was around 16:48, Jun. 11, 2013, and the facts are as follows: (a) on the 10th of the same month immediately preceding the previous month, the police officer of the E box, who reported the neighboring resident D to drive without a license and found D at the Defendant’s home, who was the police officer of the E box affiliated with I and the Assistant J, stated that “D is able to drive with a temporary driver’s license valid until June 17, 2013, and it is not a non-driving license; (b) however, D calls to the E box for the purpose of having D criminal punishment.