beta
Text
A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for a term of one year and two months.
However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date of the final judgment.
Reasons
Punishment of the crime
[criminal power] On May 19, 2016, the Defendant was sentenced to a summary order of KRW 1 million for a crime of violating the Road Traffic Act (driving) in the Gyeyang-gu District Court of Suwon on the same day. On March 28, 2019, the Defendant was sentenced to a fine of KRW 3.5 million for the same crime at the Suwon District Court.
【Criminal Facts】
1. On May 21, 2019, the Defendant was driving a DWW 125EX2125cc motor bicycle under the influence of alcohol without obtaining a driver’s license from around the 3.2km section of approximately 3.107% of blood alcohol concentration from around the 504-ro, Mapo-si, Mapo-si, Mapo-si, Mapo-si, Mapo-si, Mapo-si, Mapo-si, Mapo-si, Mapo-si, Mapo-si, Mapo-si, Mapo-si, Mapo-si.
2. The Defendant violated the Resident Registration Act: (a) during the control of drinking, driving, etc. at the same time and place as indicated in paragraph (1), the Defendant stated that there is no person who is requested to present his/her identification card from F to F of the police box affiliated with the police box; and (b) the Defendant made a statement not to obtain his/her identification card; and (c) the F unlawfully used another person’s resident registration number by entering his/her name, resident registration number,
3. The Defendant, at the same time, and at the same place as indicated in paragraph (1), committed as if he was the pro-friendly G of the Defendant who was subject to the control of drunk driving by the control police officer, and had the control police officer enter the personal information of the said G and the details of the violation, etc. in the transportation computer network, and exercised the G signature by means of digital signature in the column for the driver’s signature signature of the PDA driver, and used the forged G signature to the control police officer who was aware of the forgery as if he was his signature.
4. The Defendant who forged a private document and displayed a private document shall be from the control police officer at the same time and place as the stated in paragraph (1).