A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

1. On August 22, 2018, at least 16:20, the Defendant: (a) committed a theft by loading one bicycle (name: Products name: MATTPPHORN) at the cost of KRW 2.30,000,00 in the victim’s market price in the non-owned terminal stairs located in the non-owned Eup, non-resident, non-Si, non-Si, non-Si, non-Gun; (b) the Defendant loaded the Defendant’s vehicle onto the C

2. On September 1, 2018, the Defendant: (a) loaded one bicycle (the name of the product: MERIDA) at the market price equivalent to KRW 800,000 at the victim’s market price at the place specified in paragraph (1) at the beginning of 16:20 on September 1, 2018; and (b) stolen the Defendant’s vehicle C in loading the vehicle

3. At around 16:20 on June 20, 2019, the Defendant: (a) loaded one bicycle (the name of the product: KAREN) of an amount equivalent to KRW 110,00,00 in the market price owned by the victim under his/her name in a bicycle storage located in a non-resident non-resident non-resident non-resident Eup located in the non-resident non-resident, non-resident, non-resident, non-resident, non-resident, and stolen

4. On August 3, 2019, the Defendant: (a) committed a theft by loading one bicycle (name: PINARELO) of the amount equivalent to KRW 12 million at the market price owned by the victim G in a general restaurant access route with “F” in the former North Korea-U.S. E, on August 3, 2019.

Accordingly, the Defendant stolen four bicycles of the total market value of KRW 1,314,00,00.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. Each police statement related to G, D, and B;

1. Each report on investigation;

1. The police seizure protocol and the damaged photograph [the defendant and the defense counsel recognized the fact that the defendant brings the KAREN bicycle to the defendant's vehicle as stated in the facts charged in the judgment of the court below, but the owner did not specify the facts charged, and there is no proof as to the fact that the bicycle is owned by others and possessed by others. Thus, the defendant and the defense counsel should be acquitted of this part of the facts charged.

However, even if the owner of the damaged product is not identified, it is the date and place of the crime, the damaged product, and the theft method.