(영문) 의정부지방법원 2019.06.13 2018나214556

beta

본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.

Text

Reasons

텍스트 조절

글꼴

크기(pt)

굵기

줄 간격

자간(%)

(영문) 의정부지방법원 2019.06.13 2018나214556

손해배상(기)

Text

1. All appeals by the plaintiffs and the defendant are dismissed.

2. Of the appeal costs, the part resulting from the plaintiffs' appeal.

Reasons

1. The reasoning of the lower court’s acceptance of the judgment of the first instance is as follows, and thus, it is consistent with the reasoning of the first instance judgment.

2. The amended part of the judgment of the court of first instance (hereinafter “the instant construction contract was concluded between the defendant and the non-party company”) was sentenced to “the first and second parts “,” at the bottom of the third part of the judgment of the court of first instance,” and was sentenced to “the conclusion of the instant construction contract between the defendant and the non-party company.”

The following shall be added between the fourth 2 and third tier of the first instance judgment:

1) On September 15, 2011, the Defendant lodged a complaint with the purport that “the Plaintiff did not request the instant construction from the Defendant, but claimed the construction cost thereof.” On January 13, 2012, the prosecutor of the Cheongyang Branch Office of the Cheongyang District Prosecutors’ Office issued a disposition without suspicion against the Plaintiffs on the ground that it is difficult to deem that the Plaintiffs did not request construction from the Defendant.

(C) At the time of filing a petition for adjudication, the Defendant’s accusation against the Defendant, the complainant, was dismissed on April 18, 2012, and the petition for adjudication was dismissed on May 27, 2012.

2. On October 24, 2011, the Defendant submitted the instant construction contract document design contract, power of attorney, order contract, permission for diversion of farmland, plan for diversion of farmland, plan for prevention of damage to the use of farmland, plan for construction for large scale repair, and report on modification of the purpose of construction and substantial repair to the viewing by forging it, and forced the instant construction work by intimidation, and forced it to demand money for the construction cost.

'' has filed a complaint with the content of the complaint.

The prosecutor of the Goyang Branch Office of the Government's Provincial Prosecutors' Office shall be the prosecutor on March 16, 2012.

참조조문

-민사소송법 제420조

유사 판례

-의정부지방법원고양지원 2019.11.29 2018가단95368

-서울서부지방법원 2019.04.30 2018가단9824

-수원지방법원 2013.09.17 2013고단2358

-의정부지방법원 2017.11.15 2016가합55384

-의정부지방법원 2015.07.14 2014구합1265