Defendant

A shall be punished by imprisonment with prison labor for a year and six months, and by imprisonment with prison labor for a period of eight months.

However, as to Defendant B, this shall not apply.

Punishment of the crime

1. Defendant B

A. From February 2012, the Defendant also agreed to use a store located on the first floor in Yongsan-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government F in the same manner as A, and share monthly rent with each other (the Defendant bears 500,000 won per month and 400,000 won per month). In the above store, the Defendant sold bags with a forged trademark attached to A, and A sold the visibility with a forged trademark.

A around February 2012, around the above store, the Defendant proposed that “If it is controlled while conducting funeral services in the store, the controlled person would operate the entire store, and the Defendant consented thereto.”

On October 25, 2012, the Defendant: (a) at the above store around October 25, 2012, when the investigation officers belonging to the Goyang Branch Office of the Government's High Prosecutors' Office crack down on suspicion of violation of the Trademark Act; (b) the Defendant stated to the effect that, among the articles seized to the above investigators, the visibility attached with a forged trademark was owned by A, and was actually owned by the Defendant; and (c) the visibility attached with a forged trademark was sold in the above store; and (d) on the same day, the Defendant sent a phone to A, and said Defendant read to the effect that “I seeed that he was the president of the Republic of Korea, and was the president of the Republic of Korea.”

On October 30, 2012, the Defendant: (a) around October 30, 2012, at an infinite-dong, Yongsan-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government, “A” means that “A shall be subject to an investigation by the president of the Republic of Korea; (b)” means that “A” is “I,” and the Defendant, from April 2012 to the same day, performed funeral services; and (c) was investigated to the extent of 300,000 won.

The message sent text messages to the effect that it is ‘.’

The defendant, around October 31, 2012, agreed that the prosecutor's office at the Goyang Branch Office at the Goyang Branch Office of the Government Prosecutors' Office at 705, and that the controlled store was to be used together with the defendant and A, and the owner of the visibility with a forged trademark attached A is the actual owner of the visual burial, but around October 25, 2012, A is in violation of the Trademark Act.