A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for two years.

Punishment of the crime

【Criminal Power” On December 15, 2009, the Defendant was sentenced to a suspended sentence of two years with prison labor for false entry, etc. into public electromagnetic records, etc. at the Jeonju District Court on December 15, 2009, and on April 29, 2010, at Jeju District Court sentenced ten months of imprisonment with prison labor for special larceny, etc., and the said sentence became final and conclusive on May 3, 2010, and completed the execution of each of the above sentence at Jeju Prison on June 1, 2012.

【Criminal Facts】

1. At around 23:00 on February 18, 2015, the Defendant: (a) committed a theft by carrying 5.6 million won at the market price of wals 100 boxes harvested from C to wals wals wals wals wals wals wals wals wals wals wals wals wals wals wals wals wals w

2. Around 00:05 on February 25, 2015, the Defendant: (a) stolen the amount equivalent to KRW 900,000 at the market price of the Nowals 70 wals wals wals wals wals wals wals wals wals wals wals h

3. At around 22:00 on March 2, 2015, the Defendant: (a) went in front of the orchard warehouse of the victim JJ located in Seopopo City, Seopopopoposi; (b) went in front of the orchard warehouse; and (c) went into the warehouse through unrectible windows; and (d) cut off the amount equivalent to KRW 12:4 million at the market price of the Hanmo-gu 248 boxes kept in the warehouse; and (c) cut off the amount of KRW 12.4 million on the said cargo.

Accordingly, the defendant habitually stolen another's property.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Statement of each police statement against K and L;

1. Written statements of D;

1. A H statement;

1. Written statements and field photographs of the J;

1. Police seizure records, list of seizures and photographs of seized articles;

1. A report on investigation;

1. Previous convictions: Criminal records and investigation reports (verification of the date of release and attachment of judgment);

1. Habituality of judgment: Application of Acts and subordinate statutes recognizing dampness in light of the records of each crime, the number of crimes, the frequency of crimes, and the fact that the same kind of crimes are repeated several times in a planned and organized manner in the judgment;

1. Relevant provisions of criminal facts: Articles 332 and 330 of the Criminal Act;

1. Aggravation of repeated crimes: reasons under Article 35 of the Criminal Act;